DO I NEED SURGERY
Neck surgery is clearly the right answer for progressive neurological weakness. It is also right for cervical myelopathy (a squeezed spinal cord) with functional decline. And it is right for radiculopathy (a pinched nerve root) that has not settled with genuine conservative care and matches a structural lesion. For most neck pain, the structure causing it has to be identified first.
Two questions get lumped into one here. Could an operation help you? Has the structure causing your pain been identified? Those are different questions — and the second one has to be answered first.
When is neck surgery clearly the right answer?
There is no doubt in some presentations, and it does nobody any good to invent some.
- Progressive neurological deficit. Strength that is measurably declining, not pain that is severe. This is a decompression question, and it is time-sensitive.
- Degenerative cervical myelopathy with functional decline. Cord compression causing clumsy hands, imbalance, or a change in gait (the way you walk). The clinical practice guideline supports surgical management for moderate and severe cases. Registry data consistently show one thing. Symptoms that last longer before surgery predict a worse functional recovery afterward. This is the one diagnosis where waiting has a measurable cost.
- Radiculopathy that has not settled with genuine conservative management, where a structural lesion matches the exam and the level. In that group, surgery relieves arm pain faster than conservative care. The systematic reviews are fairly consistent on two points. The advantage is in speed. And the gap narrows over one to two years.
The findings that should not wait are listed separately. They are short on purpose.
Do I need surgery if my MRI shows wear in my neck?
Most neck pain is not in the categories above. Persistent axial neck pain — pain in the neck and shoulder blade, without a matching neurological deficit — is the most common case we see. It is also the one where a scan showing degenerative change (discs and joints breaking down) is least likely to be the explanation.
Fusing a level because it looks worn on imaging, with no test tying that level to the symptom, is how people end up with a solid fusion and unchanged pain. The operation succeeded. The question it answered was never asked.
For that group there is a testable alternative path. Facet-mediated pain (pain from the facet joints) can be identified with diagnostic blocks and treated with ablation. And the two procedures treat different problems rather than competing for the same one.
Does this practice perform neck surgery?
We are not a practice that steers patients away from surgeons on principle. It would be dishonest to present restraint as a virtue when the real position is narrower than that. Dr. Padda is a surgeon. The practice performs stimulator and pump implants, nerve decompressions and microdiscectomy. Cervical fusion itself is not part of the treatment plan here. Where it is truly indicated, we say so and help you get to the right surgeon.
What we do is send you into that conversation with an examined diagnosis. The value we add before a surgical opinion is finding which structure generates the pain. That way, the surgeon is answering a specific question, not an open one. That is the same note we send to referring physicians.
What should I ask a surgeon before neck surgery?
- Which structure is generating my pain, and what established that? A level named on imaging is not the same as a level tested.
- What is this operation expected to fix, specifically? Arm pain, neck pain, weakness and numbness respond differently. An operation aimed at one will be judged on all four.
- What happens to the levels above and below? Adjacent segments carry the load a fused level no longer takes. And the rotation you lose is not usually discussed beforehand.
None of these is a hostile question. A surgeon with a clear indication answers all three quickly. That is exactly why they are worth asking. Whether any of this applies to you depends on which structure is causing it.
Frequently asked questions about neck surgery
How do I know if I need surgery on my neck?
Three findings point clearly toward surgery. Strength that is measurably getting weaker. Spinal cord compression that makes your hands clumsy or changes your balance or walk. Arm pain from a pinched nerve that has not settled with real conservative care and matches what the scan shows. For most other neck pain, the first job is finding which structure is actually causing it.
Is it worth having neck surgery?
It depends on what the operation is meant to fix. For a pinched nerve that has not settled, surgery relieves arm pain faster than conservative care. But the gap narrows over one to two years. For cord compression with worsening function, waiting has a real cost. For neck pain alone, fusing a level only because it looks worn can leave a solid fusion and the same pain.
Is there an alternative to neck surgery?
Often, yes. When the pain comes from the small facet joints at the back of the neck, a diagnostic block can show whether that joint is the source. If it is, radiofrequency ablation treats the nerve carrying that pain. Ablation and fusion treat different problems. So the test decides which one fits you, rather than one simply replacing the other.
When should I get a second opinion on neck surgery?
Before the operation is scheduled, not after. A second opinion is most useful when a level in your neck has been named on a scan but never tested. Finding which structure generates the pain means the surgeon answers a specific question, not an open one. A surgeon with a clear reason to operate can explain it quickly.
Get the diagnosis tested before the decision
A second opinion is most useful before an operation is scheduled, not after. If a level has been named but never tested, that is the gap worth closing.
12174 Natural Bridge Rd, Suite 302
St. Louis, MO 63044
Next to DePaul Hospital, just off the 270 and 70 junction, west of the airport.
Sources
- Fehlings MG et al. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression. Global spine journal, 2017. PubMed 29164035
- Nagoshi N et al. Impact of Symptom Duration on Surgical Outcomes and Functional Recovery in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights from a Prospective Multicenter Study. Spine, 2026. PubMed 40981281
- Dar KH et al. Nonsurgical versus surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. PubMed 42029974
- Taso M et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. PubMed 32178655
- Gembruch O et al. Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: What Really Counts?. Spine, 2021. PubMed 33065693

